Axum Code Review
/install axum-code-review
Axum Code Review
Review Workflow
- Check Cargo.toml — Note axum version (0.6 vs 0.7+ have different patterns), Rust edition (2021 vs 2024), tower, tower-http features. Edition 2024 changes RPIT lifetime capture in handler return types and removes the need for
async-traitin custom extractors. - Check routing — Route organization, method routing, nested routers
- Check extractors — Order matters (body extractors must be last), correct types
- Check state — Shared state via
State\x3CT>, not global mutable state - Check error handling —
IntoResponseimplementations, error types
Gates (before reporting findings)
Run in order. Do not write a finding until the step that applies has passed.
-
Version and edition on disk — Pass when: You have read the relevant
Cargo.toml(crate or workspace root) and can stateaxum(and related tower/tower-http) versions and Rustedition. Then apply 0.6 vs 0.7+ or Edition 2024–specific checklist items only when that file supports them. -
Per-finding evidence — Pass when: Each issue cites
[FILE:LINE]from the current tree for the handler, router, layer, or type under review (not from memory, docs-only, or another branch). -
Category check vs protocol — Pass when: For the finding type (routing conflict, extractor order, error leak, middleware order, etc.), you ran the matching checks from
beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol(e.g. full handler signature for extractor order; surrounding error mapping before “raw error to client”). Then add the finding. -
Output shape — Pass when: The report lines match Output Format below (severity + description).
Output Format
Report findings as:
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Route definitions, nesting, method routing | references/routing.md |
| State, Path, Query, Json, body extractors | references/extractors.md |
| Tower middleware, layers, error handling | references/middleware.md |
Review Checklist
Routing
- Routes organized by domain (nested routers for
/api/users,/api/orders) - Fallback handlers defined for 404s
- Method routing explicit (
.get(),.post(), not.route()with manual method matching) - No route conflicts (overlapping paths with different extractors)
Extractors
- Body-consuming extractors (
Json,Form,Bytes) are the LAST parameter -
State\x3CT>requiresT: Clone— typicallyArc\x3CAppState>or directClonederive -
Path\x3CT>parameter types match the route definition -
Query\x3CT>fields areOptionfor optional query params with#[serde(default)] - Custom extractors implement
FromRequestParts(not body) orFromRequest(body) - Edition 2024: Custom extractors use native
async fnin trait impls (no#[async_trait]needed forFromRequest/FromRequestParts)
State Management
- Application state shared via
State\x3CT>, not global mutable statics - Database pool in state (not created per-request)
- State contains only shared resources (pool, config, channels), not request-specific data
-
Clonederived or manually implemented on state type - Edition 2024: Shared static state uses
LazyLockfrom std (notonce_cell::sync::Lazyorlazy_static!)
Error Handling
- Handler errors implement
IntoResponsefor proper HTTP error codes - Internal errors don't leak to clients (no raw error messages in 500 responses)
- Error responses use consistent format (JSON error body with code/message)
-
Result\x3Cimpl IntoResponse, AppError>pattern used for handlers - Edition 2024: Handler return types
-> impl IntoResponsecapture all in-scope lifetimes by default; use+ use\x3C>to opt out of capturing request lifetimes when returning owned data
Middleware
- Tower layers applied in correct order (outer runs first on request, last on response)
-
tower-httpused for common concerns (CORS, compression, tracing, timeout) - Request-scoped data passed via extensions, not global state
- Middleware errors don't panic — they return error responses
- Edition 2024: Middleware using
#[async_trait]can migrate to nativeasync fnin trait impls
Severity Calibration
Critical
- Body extractor not last in handler parameters (silently consumes body, later extractors fail)
- SQL injection via path/query parameters passed directly to queries
- Internal error details leaked to clients (stack traces, database errors)
- Missing authentication middleware on protected routes
Major
- Global mutable state instead of
State\x3CT>(race conditions) - Missing error type conversion (raw
sqlx::Errorreturned to client) - Missing request timeout (handlers can hang indefinitely)
- Route conflicts causing unexpected 405s
- Edition 2024:
async-traitstill used forFromRequest/FromRequestPartswhen native async fn works
Minor
- Manual route method matching instead of
.get(),.post() - Missing fallback handler (default 404 is plain text, not JSON)
- Middleware applied per-route when it should be global (or vice versa)
- Missing
tower-http::tracefor request logging - Edition 2024:
once_cell::sync::Lazyorlazy_static!used wherestd::sync::LazyLockworks
Informational
- Suggestions to use
tower-httplayers for common concerns - Router organization improvements
- Suggestions to add OpenAPI documentation via
utoipaoraide
Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)
#[axum::debug_handler]on handlers — Debugging aid that improves compile error messagesExtension\x3CT>for middleware-injected data — Valid pattern for request-scoped values- Returning
impl IntoResponsefrom handlers — More flexible than concrete types Router::new()per module, merged in main — Standard organization patternServiceBuilderfor layer composition — Tower pattern, not over-engineeringaxum::servewithTcpListener— Standard axum 0.7+ server setup- Native
async fninFromRequest/FromRequestPartsimpls —async-traitcrate no longer needed (stable since Rust 1.75) + use\x3C'a>on handler return types — Edition 2024 precise capture syntax for RPITstd::sync::LazyLockfor shared static state — Replacesonce_cell/lazy_static(stable since Rust 1.80)
Before Submitting Findings
Complete Gates (before reporting findings) and load beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol for category-specific checks before any issue is final.
- Make sure OpenClaw is installed (local or Docker)
- Run the install command in chat:
/install axum-code-review - After installation, invoke the skill by name or use
/axum-code-review - Provide required inputs per the skill's parameter spec and get structured output
What is Axum Code Review?
Reviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that us... It is an AI Agent Skill for Claude Code / OpenClaw, with 178 downloads so far.
How do I install Axum Code Review?
Run "/install axum-code-review" in the OpenClaw or Claude Code chat to install it in one step — no extra setup required.
Is Axum Code Review free?
Yes, Axum Code Review is completely free, licensed under MIT-0. You can download, install and use it at no cost.
Which platforms does Axum Code Review support?
Axum Code Review is cross-platform and runs anywhere OpenClaw / Claude Code is available (cross-platform).
Who created Axum Code Review?
It is built and maintained by Kevin Anderson (@anderskev); the current version is v1.0.2.