← 返回 Skills 市场
zhaocaixia888

Research Assistant

作者 zhaocaixia888 · GitHub ↗ · v1.0.2 · MIT-0
cross-platform ⚠ suspicious
46
总下载
0
收藏
0
当前安装
1
版本数
在 OpenClaw 中安装
/install zcx-research-assistant
功能描述
Conduct multi-source research with cross-verification to produce structured reports like SWOT, competitor analyses, or industry briefs with full source citat...
使用说明 (SKILL.md)

Research Assistant — 深度研究助手

Conduct multi-source deep research with cross-verification, structured report generation, and full source attribution.

Research Workflow

1. Clarify Scope  →  What's the research question? What depth is needed?
2. Multi-Source   →  Search across at least 3 independent sources
3. Cross-Verify   →  Identify conflicts, confirm consensus
4. Synthesize     →  Build structured report
5. Cite Sources   →  Every claim gets a source URL

Always follow this order. Do not skip cross-verification.

Step 1 — Clarify Scope

Ask yourself:

  • Topic: What exactly is being researched?
  • Depth: Quick brief (3-5 key points) vs deep report (SWOT, data, trends)?
  • Timeframe: Current snapshot, historical trend, or future outlook?
  • Geography: Global, regional (APAC, EU, US), or specific country (China)?
  • Audience: Technical (data-heavy) vs executive (summary + recommendations)?

Output: A 1-2 sentence research objective statement.

Step 2 — Multi-Source Retrieval

Method A: Web Search (Broad Discovery)

web_search(query="\x3Ctopic> \x3Ccontext>", count=5-10)

Search strategy — use 3-5 search queries per research topic:

  1. Overview: "\x3Ctopic>" overview 2026
  2. Data/statistics: "\x3Ctopic>" statistics data market size
  3. News/recent: "\x3Ctopic>" latest news 2026
  4. Competitors: "\x3Ctopic>" competitors leading companies
  5. Analysis: "\x3Ctopic>" analysis report SWOT

Method B: Deep Fetch (Page-Level Detail)

For each promising search result, fetch the full page:

web_fetch(url, extractMode="markdown", maxChars=15000)

Prioritize sources in this order:

  1. Primary sources — Official company reports, government data, regulatory filings
  2. Industry sources — Specialized trade publications, analyst reports
  3. Major media — Established financial/industry news outlets
  4. Secondary sources — Aggregators, summaries, blogs (lowest priority)

Minimum source count: At least 3 independent sources per key claim.

Method C: Targeted Queries (Gap Filling)

When initial results leave gaps (missing data, conflicting info, too old):

web_search(query="\x3Crefined query>", count=3)

Repeat until each major section of the report has supporting sources.

Step 3 — Cross-Verification

Conflict Detection

When sources disagree:

Conflict Type Resolution
Different numbers (e.g., market size) Check dates (older may be out of date), cite the most recent or authoritative
Contradictory claims Find a 3rd/4th source to break the tie
One strong + one weak Trust the stronger (more authoritative, more recent, cited data)
Both weak Flag as "conflicting reports" in the output

Verification Checklist

For each key fact, confirm:

  • At least 2 independent sources agree
  • Data includes a clear date or timeframe
  • Source is authoritative (official > news > blog)
  • Numbers are internally consistent (percentages add up, totals match)
  • No obvious bias or agenda in the source

Quality Scoring

Score Criteria
✅ Confirmed 3+ independent reliable sources agree
⚠️ Likely 2 sources agree, no strong counter-evidence
❓ Uncertain Only 1 source, or sources conflict
❌ Contradicted Multiple sources disagree with the claim

Mark each major finding with its confidence level.

Step 4 — Report Templates

Template A: Research Brief (Quick — 3-5 key points)

# Research Brief: [Topic] (Date)

## Objective
[1-line research question]

## Key Findings
1. **[Finding 1]** — Source: [URL]
2. **[Finding 2]** — Source: [URL]
3. **[Finding 3]** — Source: [URL]

## Summary
[3-5 sentence synthesis of all findings]

## Sources
- [Source 1 Title](URL)
- [Source 2 Title](URL)

Template B: SWOT Analysis

# SWOT: [Company/Topic] (Date)

## Strengths (Internal Positive)
- [Strength 1] — Source: [URL]
- [Strength 2] — Source: [URL]

## Weaknesses (Internal Negative)
- [Weakness 1] — Source: [URL]
- [Weakness 2] — Source: [URL]

## Opportunities (External Positive)
- [Opportunity 1] — Source: [URL]
- [Opportunity 2] — Source: [URL]

## Threats (External Negative)
- [Threat 1] — Source: [URL]
- [Threat 2] — Source: [URL]

## Strategic Implications
[2-3 sentence synthesis of what the SWOT means]

Template C: Competitor Analysis

# Competitive Analysis: [Industry/Segment] (Date)

## Market Overview
- Total addressable market: [data + source]
- Growth rate: [data + source]
- Key trends: [3-5 trends + sources]

## Competitor Profiles

### [Competitor A]
- **Position:** [Market leader / Challenger / Niche]
- **Revenue/Size:** [Data + source]
- **Key Strengths:** [...]
- **Key Weaknesses:** [...]
- **Recent Moves:** [1-2 notable events + source]

### [Competitor B]
...

## Competitive Map
| Dimension | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|:----------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Market Share | X% | Y% | Z% |
| Pricing | High/Medium/Low | ... | ... |
| Feature Set | Full/Basic | ... | ... |

## Recommendations
[Based on the analysis]

Template D: Full Industry Research Report

# Industry Report: [Industry Name] (Date)

## 1. Executive Summary
[3-5 sentence overview with key numbers]

## 2. Market Size & Growth
- Current market size: [data + year + source]
- CAGR: [X% + source]
- Forecast: [projected size + year + source]

## 3. Key Players
[Table of top 5-10 companies with market share, revenue, focus areas]

## 4. Trends & Drivers
1. **[Trend 1]** — [1-2 sentence explanation + source]
2. **[Trend 2]** — [1-2 sentence explanation + source]

## 5. Challenges & Risks
1. **[Risk 1]** — [1-2 sentence explanation + source]
2. **[Risk 2]** — [1-2 sentence explanation + source]

## 6. Regulatory Environment
[Key regulations, policies, compliance requirements + sources]

## 7. Outlook & Recommendations
[3-5 specific, actionable recommendations based on data]

## 8. Sources
For each source: [Title](URL) — confidence level

Source Citation Rules

Every factual claim in the output must include a source URL.

Format:

[Claim text] — Source: [Source Name](URL)

For reports with many sources, include a Sources section at the end with all URLs.

Blacklisting

Do not use these source types as primary sources:

  • Anonymous forums (unless specifically investigating sentiment)
  • Self-published/promotional content
  • Unedited AI-generated content
  • Clickbait aggregators with no original reporting

If a user asks for information from a blacklisted source type, warn them and find better sources.

安全使用建议
Install this only in a trusted ClawHub maintainer environment. Review the autoreview helper before use, consider running it with --no-yolo or AUTOREVIEW_YOLO=0, and avoid moderation --yes flows unless you have verified the exact target, reason, and account/content impact.
能力评估
Purpose & Capability
The artifacts are coherent for ClawHub and Convex maintainer work, but they include high-impact capabilities such as banning or unbanning users, changing roles, hiding/restoring content through moderation flows, publishing PR proof artifacts, running Convex migrations, and launching a nested Codex review with full filesystem/network authority by default.
Instruction Scope
Most instructions are scoped and disclosed, including explicit target, reason, confirmation, role-check, and audit-log requirements for moderation. The main concern is the autoreview helper's default use of approval/sandbox bypass and fallback reviewers that may receive generated diff prompts.
Install Mechanism
No hidden install-time execution or stealth setup was found in the inspected skill files. The bundle includes an executable autoreview helper; the repo package preinstall only enforces Bun usage if the broader repo package is installed.
Credentials
The authority is proportionate for trusted ClawHub maintainers working in the ClawHub repository, but overbroad for general users because it can act through local GitHub, ClawHub, Convex, and reviewer CLI credentials.
Persistence & Privilege
No stealth persistence, startup hooks, cron installation, or background worker behavior was found in the skill artifacts. Some referenced workflows start normal development watchers or write proof artifacts, but those are disclosed and task-directed.
如何使用
  1. 确保已安装 OpenClaw(本地或 Docker 部署)
  2. 在对话框中输入安装命令:/install zcx-research-assistant
  3. 安装完成后,直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用 /zcx-research-assistant 触发
  4. 根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入,即可获得结构化输出
版本历史
v1.0.2
Initial release on ClawHub
元数据
Slug zcx-research-assistant
版本 1.0.2
许可证 MIT-0
累计安装 0
当前安装数 0
历史版本数 1
常见问题

Research Assistant 是什么?

Conduct multi-source research with cross-verification to produce structured reports like SWOT, competitor analyses, or industry briefs with full source citat... 它是一个面向 Claude Code / OpenClaw 的 AI Agent Skill 插件,目前累计下载 46 次。

如何安装 Research Assistant?

在 OpenClaw 或 Claude Code 对话框中运行命令「/install zcx-research-assistant」即可一键安装,无需额外配置。

Research Assistant 是免费的吗?

是的,Research Assistant 完全免费,采用 MIT-0 许可证,可自由下载、安装和使用。

Research Assistant 支持哪些平台?

Research Assistant 跨平台运行,可在任意部署了 OpenClaw / Claude Code 的环境中使用(cross-platform)。

谁开发了 Research Assistant?

由 zhaocaixia888(@zhaocaixia888)开发并维护,当前版本 v1.0.2。

💬 留言讨论