Writing Credibility Auditor

Audit any piece of writing for missing citations, unsupported claims, logical fallacies, weasel words, and misleading statistics — then produce a structured...

This skill is internally consistent and low-risk because it only contains written instructions for analyzing text and requests no installs, files, or credentials. Before installing, note these practical limitations: the skill does not perform live fact-checking or verify external sources (it audits reasoning and language only), so outputs that appear to cite studies or assert factual corrections should be double-checked against primary sources. Also be aware that purely model-driven detection can produce false positives/negatives and may sometimes overconfidently label passages — treat the Credibility Report as guidance, not authoritative proof. If you need authoritative fact verification, prefer a skill that explicitly uses vetted web APIs or human expert review. Finally, if you later see this skill ask for environment variables, external URLs, or to run system commands, stop and re-evaluate — those would be unexpected for this skill and would raise concern.