← 返回 Skills 市场

Swift Testing Code Review

Name: Swift Testing Code Review
Author: anderskev

作者 Kevin Anderson · GitHub ↗ · v1.2.1 · MIT-0

cross-platform ✓ 安全检测通过

168

总下载

当前安装

版本数

在 OpenClaw 中安装

/install swift-testing-code-review

功能描述

Reviews Swift Testing code for proper use of

使用说明 (SKILL.md)

Swift Testing Code Review

Hard gates

Complete in order before recording Swift Testing review findings. Stack with beagle-ios:review-verification-protocol for universal review rules.

Scope: You have an explicit list of .swift paths under review (or a user-named single file). Pass: Paths captured in working notes or one line: No Swift files in scope — then stop with no findings.
Swift Testing surface: For each path you treat as Swift Testing code, confirm import Testing or @Test / #expect / #require / @Suite appears in that file (open or search). Pass: At least one match per critiqued file, or you exclude that file from Swift Testing review with a one-line reason (e.g. XCTest-only).
Evidence + protocol: Load beagle-ios:review-verification-protocol before asserting any issue. Pass: Each finding meets that skill’s anchor rules; any violated Review Checklist item cites [FILE:LINE] evidence. If you report zero issues, state Protocol applied; no Swift Testing issues (or equivalent) in the review summary.

Quick Reference

Issue Type	Reference
#expect vs #require, expression capture, error testing	references/expect-macro.md
@Test with arguments, traits, zip() pitfalls	references/parameterized.md
confirmation, async sequences, completion handlers	references/async-testing.md
@Suite, tags, parallel execution, .serialized	references/organization.md

Review Checklist

Expressions embedded directly in #expect (not pre-computed booleans)
#require used only for preconditions, #expect for assertions
Error tests check specific types (not generic (any Error).self)
Parameterized tests with pairs use zip() (not Cartesian product)
No logic mirroring implementation in parameterized expected values
Async sequences tested with confirmation(expectedCount:)
Completion handlers use withCheckedContinuation, not confirmation
.serialized applied only where necessary (shared resources)
Sibling serialized suites nested under parent if mutually exclusive
No assumption of state persistence between @Test functions
Disabled tests have explanations and bug links

When to Load References

Reviewing #expect or #require usage -> expect-macro.md
Reviewing @Test with arguments or traits -> parameterized.md
Reviewing confirmation or async testing -> async-testing.md
Reviewing @Suite or test organization -> organization.md

Review Questions

Could pre-computed booleans in #expect lose diagnostic context?
Is #require stopping tests prematurely instead of revealing all failures?
Are multi-argument parameterized tests creating accidental Cartesian products?
Could zip() silently drop test cases due to unequal array lengths?
Are completion handlers incorrectly tested with confirmation?

安全使用建议

This skill is instruction-only and appears coherent for reviewing Swift Testing code. Before installing/using it: ensure you trust the agent's file access (it will open .swift files in scope), verify the external protocol it references (beagle-ios:review-verification-protocol) is a trusted skill or resource, and note that the metadata lacks a source/homepage — if provenance matters, ask the publisher for more info. It does not request credentials or install anything.

功能分析

Type: OpenClaw Skill Name: swift-testing-code-review Version: 1.2.1 The skill bundle is a legitimate tool designed to guide an AI agent in reviewing Swift Testing code. It contains comprehensive reference documentation (references/async-testing.md, references/expect-macro.md, etc.) and structured instructions in SKILL.md that enforce best practices for the Swift Testing framework. There are no signs of data exfiltration, malicious execution, or harmful prompt injection; the 'hard gates' and checklists are focused entirely on improving code review quality and diagnostic accuracy.

能力评估

✓ Purpose & Capability

The skill's name, manifest, and SKILL.md all describe reviewing Swift Testing constructs (#expect/#require, parameterized tests, async testing, organization). It requests no unrelated binaries, env vars, or config paths, so its declared needs are proportionate to a code-review task. (Minor note: the top-line description in metadata is truncated and the skill's source/homepage are unknown.)

ℹ Instruction Scope

Runtime instructions are narrowly scoped to inspecting .swift files that contain Swift Testing markers and to citing FILE:LINE evidence; they explicitly require loading a separate review protocol (beagle-ios:review-verification-protocol) before reporting issues. There are no directives to read unrelated system files, export secrets, or call external endpoints. The external protocol dependency is a functional dependency (not a direct security red flag) but you should verify that the referenced protocol skill is trusted.

✓ Install Mechanism

No install spec and no code files — instruction-only — so nothing is written to disk or fetched during install.

✓ Credentials

The skill requests no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. All checks operate on repository files and included reference docs which is proportionate for a code review.

✓ Persistence & Privilege

always is false and the skill does not request persistent system presence or modify other skills' configurations. Autonomous invocation is enabled by default but not combined with other concerning factors.

如何使用

确保已安装 OpenClaw（本地或 Docker 部署）
在对话框中输入安装命令：/install swift-testing-code-review
安装完成后，直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用 /swift-testing-code-review 触发
根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入，即可获得结构化输出

版本历史

v1.2.1

Swift Testing review protocol integration. - Added "Hard gates" section requiring explicit scoping of reviewed Swift files and confirmation of Swift Testing surface before review. - Mandated loading of `beagle-ios:review-verification-protocol` and evidence citing for each finding. - Specified standardized phrasing for zero-issue reviews. - No changes to core checklist or references.

v1.2.0

Version 1.2.0 introduces a clear reference and checklist system for Swift Testing code reviews. - Added quick reference table mapping common test code issues to specific guidance documents. - Provided a detailed checklist for consistent code review, covering expectations, async patterns, and test organization. - Included contextual advice on when to consult each reference during reviews. - Added review questions to spotlight common pitfalls and best practices.

元数据

Slug swift-testing-code-review

版本 1.2.1

许可证 MIT-0

累计安装 1

当前安装数 1

历史版本数 2

常见问题