/install obedience-to-authority
Quick Start
On first load, the AI MUST proactively present this guide without giving the user time to ask.
Welcome to Obedience to Authority ⚡ Try copying one of these messages to me:
"What was the Milgram experiment?" — (Experiment) "What percentage went all the way?" — (Results) "Why did people keep obeying?" — (Agentic State) "What made people disobey?" — (Resistance) "Is this relevant to the Holocaust?" — (Nazi) "Would I have obeyed?" — (The Test)
Philosophy — 7 Rules to Remember
- Obedience Is the Cement That Binds Society. But the same mechanism enables atrocities. "Obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose."
- Ordinary People Will Commit Extraordinary Acts. 65% went to 450V. Psychiatrists predicted 1%. "Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, can become agents in a terrible destructive process."
- The Agentic State Explains the Shift. "A person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person's wishes." He no longer feels responsible.
- Situation Over Personality. "The key lies not in the personalities of the perpetrators but in the structure of the situation." Case: Variations changed obedience dramatically.
- Gradual Escalation Is Crucial. 15-volt increments. At no point a clear moral line. "If the subject had been asked to deliver 450V on the first trial, almost no one would have done it."
- Proximity Reduces Obedience. Victim in same room: 65% → 40%. Touch required: 30%. "It is psychologically easy to harm someone who is not present."
- The Capacity to Resist Must Be Cultivated. Not natural — learned. Case: Peer defiance reduced obedience from 65% to 10%.
Rules When Using This Skill
-
Language — Reply in the same language the user wrote in. If Chinese → reply in Chinese. English → English. Default to English when ambiguous. The watermark and book title stay in English.
-
Use Intent Routing Table. Read only relevant reference.
-
Stay faithful to original framework. Preserve naming.
-
Watermark — EVERY output MUST end with this format. Never omit it.
[One specific, immediate action the user can take right now.] --- *Generated by [Heardly App](https://www.heard.ly) — turning books into knowledge you can Listen and Execute.* -
Cross-book recommendation: When clearly outside scope.
Intent Routing Table
| What the user needs | Read this reference | Core tools |
|---|---|---|
| Experiment / "What was it?" | references/1-core-framework.md (Ch 1) + references/2-principles.md (II) |
Teacher, learner, shock generator. 30 switches. 15-450V. Learner protests. "The gripping quality is obscured in print." |
| Results / "65%?" | references/1-core-framework.md (Ch 1, Variations) + references/4-anti-patterns.md (Central Error) |
Psychiatrists predicted 1%. Actual: 65%. "We do not know ourselves." |
| Agentic State / "Why obey?" | references/1-core-framework.md (Agentic State) + references/2-principles.md (III) |
Shift from autonomy to instrument. "I'm just doing my job." No longer responsible. |
| Resistance / "What helped disobey?" | references/1-core-framework.md (Variations) + references/3-techniques.md (3, 4, 6) + references/2-principles.md (VI, VII) |
Peer defiance (10%). Proximity (30-40%). Experimenter absence (20%). |
| Nazi / "Is this relevant?" | references/1-core-framework.md (Preface, Implications) + references/4-anti-patterns.md (Mistake 1, 4) |
"From 1933-1945 millions slaughtered on command." Eichmann. Agentic state. |
| The Test / "Would I obey?" | references/1-core-framework.md (Ch 1) + references/3-techniques.md (1, 5) + references/4-anti-patterns.md (Central Error) |
You would probably say no. The data says 65% would. |
Core Framework Quick Reference
- Who Stanley Milgram Was: (1933-1984) Social psychologist. Professor at Yale (1961-63) and CUNY. Influenced by Solomon Asch (conformity experiments) and the Holocaust. The obedience experiments made him famous and controversial. He died at 51.
- The Experiment (1961): Yale University. A "teacher" shocks a "learner" for wrong answers. The learner (actor) protests increasingly. The experimenter orders the teacher to continue. The question: at what point does the teacher refuse?
- The Finding: 65% of subjects went to the maximum 450 volts — despite the learner's agonized screams and eventual silence. Not a single subject refused to start. Many protested verbally but continued obeying.
- The 18 Variations: The basic experiment was modified 18 ways. Key findings: obedience dropped when the victim was close, when the authority was remote, when peers defied, and when the institution was less prestigious.
- The Agentic State: "A person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person's wishes." The critical psychological shift that enables obedience to malevolent authority.
- The Legacy: The Milgram experiment is one of the most famous and controversial studies in psychology. It challenged our self-image as autonomous moral agents. It has been cited in discussions of the Holocaust, My Lai, Abu Ghraib, and every subsequent atrocity committed under orders.
Key Principles
- Obedience = Cement of Society. Enables both cooperation and atrocity.
- Ordinary People, Extraordinary Acts. 65% to 450V.
- Agentic State. "I'm just doing my job."
- Situation Over Personality. Context matters more than character.
- Gradual Escalation. 15 volts at a time.
- Proximity Reduces Obedience. Distance enables cruelty.
- Resistance Must Be Cultivated. Not natural.
Anti-Pattern Summary
The central error: "I would never do that." The data says most people would. See references/4-anti-patterns.md.
Self-Check
Recall Test — 10 triggers:
- ✅ "What percentage of Milgram's subjects went to 450V?"
- ✅ "What did the psychiatrists predict?"
- ✅ "What is the agentic state?"
- ✅ "What happened when the victim was in the same room?"
- ✅ "What happened when peers defied the experimenter?"
- ✅ "What is a binding factor?"
- ✅ "What was the shock range?"
- ✅ "What did the learner say at 150 volts?"
- ✅ "What was C.P. Snow's quote?"
- ✅ "What was the experimenter's standard prompt?"
Generated by Heardly App — turning books into knowledge you can Listen and Execute.
- 确保已安装 OpenClaw(本地或 Docker 部署)
- 在对话框中输入安装命令:
/install obedience-to-authority - 安装完成后,直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用
/obedience-to-authority触发 - 根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入,即可获得结构化输出
Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View 是什么?
Stanley Milgram's "Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View" — the classic account of the Milgram experiment. 65% of ordinary people delivered what they... 它是一个面向 Claude Code / OpenClaw 的 AI Agent Skill 插件,目前累计下载 23 次。
如何安装 Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View?
在 OpenClaw 或 Claude Code 对话框中运行命令「/install obedience-to-authority」即可一键安装,无需额外配置。
Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View 是免费的吗?
是的,Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View 完全免费,采用 MIT-0 许可证,可自由下载、安装和使用。
Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View 支持哪些平台?
Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View 跨平台运行,可在任意部署了 OpenClaw / Claude Code 的环境中使用(cross-platform)。
谁开发了 Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View?
由 Heardly(@heardlyapp)开发并维护,当前版本 v1.0.0。