← 返回 Skills 市场
krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd

Kubernetes Network Policy Generator

作者 ToolWeb · GitHub ↗ · v1.0.0 · MIT-0
linuxdarwinwin32 ⚠ suspicious
203
总下载
0
收藏
0
当前安装
1
版本数
在 OpenClaw 中安装
/install k8s-network-policy-generator
功能描述
Evaluate and compare privacy solution vendors with a weighted scorecard across 12 criteria. Use when selecting privacy management software, comparing data pr...
使用说明 (SKILL.md)

Privacy Solution Scorecard 📊🏆

Evaluate and compare privacy management solution vendors using a comprehensive weighted scorecard. Score vendors across 12 criteria covering functionality, architecture, automation, compliance, cost, and vendor stability. Returns detailed scorecards, side-by-side comparison matrix, recommendations, and executive summary.

Built by a CISSP/CISM certified security professional at ToolWeb.in

When to Use

  • User asks to evaluate or compare privacy solutions/vendors
  • User needs help selecting a consent management platform
  • User wants to score privacy tools like OneTrust, BigID, TrustArc, Securiti, etc.
  • User mentions privacy solution RFP, vendor selection, or tool comparison
  • User needs a business case for a privacy management platform
  • User asks about privacy tool features, pricing, or deployment options

Prerequisites

  • TOOLWEB_API_KEY — Get your API key from portal.toolweb.in
  • curl must be available on the system

API Endpoint

POST https://portal.toolweb.in/apis/compliance/privacy-scorecard

12 Evaluation Criteria

Key Criteria Category Weight
functionality_coverage Comprehensive Functionality Core Capabilities 1.0
modular_architecture Modular Design & Flexibility Core Capabilities 0.9
deployment_options Deployment Options Core Capabilities
transparency_communication Transparency & Communication Core Capabilities
scalability Scalability Core Capabilities
automation_efficiency Automation & Efficiency Core Capabilities
future_readiness Future Readiness Core Capabilities
regulatory_coverage Regulatory Coverage Compliance
integration_ecosystem Integration Ecosystem Technical
reporting_analytics Reporting & Analytics Technical
vendor_stability Vendor Stability Vendor
total_cost_ownership Total Cost of Ownership Financial

Each criterion is scored 1-5:

  • 5 = Exceptional / best-in-class
  • 4 = Strong with good capabilities
  • 3 = Adequate with basic features
  • 2 = Limited, requires workarounds
  • 1 = Minimal with significant gaps

Workflow

  1. Gather inputs from the user:

    Organization context:

    • organization_name — Organization name
    • evaluator_name — Person conducting the evaluation
    • organization_size — "Small (1-50 employees)", "Medium (51-500)", "Large (501-5000)", "Enterprise (5000+)"
    • industry_sector — e.g., "Financial Services & Banking", "Healthcare & Life Sciences", "Technology & Software", "Retail & E-commerce", "Manufacturing", "Telecommunications", "Government & Public Sector", "Education"
    • budget_range — e.g., "Under $25,000/year", "$25,000-$75,000/year", "$75,000-$150,000/year", "$150,000-$300,000/year", "Over $300,000/year"
    • deployment_preference — "Cloud", "On-Premise", or "Hybrid"
    • primary_regulations — List of applicable regulations: ["GDPR", "CCPA/CPRA", "DPDP Act (India)", "LGPD (Brazil)", "PIPEDA (Canada)"]
    • priority_criteria — Most important criteria keys from the 12 above (optional)

    Vendor evaluations — For each vendor being compared, gather:

    • vendor_name — Name of the vendor (e.g., "OneTrust", "BigID", "Securiti")
    • scores — Dictionary of criterion key to score (1-5) for each of the 12 criteria
    • notes — Optional notes per criterion
  2. Call the API:

curl -s -X POST "https://portal.toolweb.in/apis/compliance/privacy-scorecard" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $TOOLWEB_API_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "organization_name": "\x3Corg>",
    "evaluator_name": "\x3Cname>",
    "organization_size": "\x3Csize>",
    "industry_sector": "\x3Cindustry>",
    "budget_range": "\x3Cbudget>",
    "deployment_preference": "\x3CCloud/On-Premise/Hybrid>",
    "primary_regulations": ["GDPR", "CCPA/CPRA"],
    "priority_criteria": ["functionality_coverage", "regulatory_coverage"],
    "vendors": [
      {
        "vendor_name": "Vendor A",
        "scores": {
          "functionality_coverage": 4,
          "modular_architecture": 3,
          "deployment_options": 4,
          "transparency_communication": 3,
          "scalability": 4,
          "automation_efficiency": 3,
          "future_readiness": 4,
          "regulatory_coverage": 5,
          "integration_ecosystem": 3,
          "reporting_analytics": 4,
          "vendor_stability": 4,
          "total_cost_ownership": 3
        }
      },
      {
        "vendor_name": "Vendor B",
        "scores": {
          "functionality_coverage": 3,
          "modular_architecture": 4,
          "deployment_options": 3,
          "transparency_communication": 4,
          "scalability": 3,
          "automation_efficiency": 4,
          "future_readiness": 3,
          "regulatory_coverage": 4,
          "integration_ecosystem": 4,
          "reporting_analytics": 3,
          "vendor_stability": 3,
          "total_cost_ownership": 4
        }
      }
    ],
    "include_recommendations": true,
    "include_comparison_matrix": true
  }'
  1. Parse the response. The API returns:

    • scorecard_html — Detailed vendor scorecards with weighted scores
    • comparison_html — Side-by-side comparison matrix
    • recommendations_html — Detailed recommendations
    • executive_summary_html — Board-level summary
  2. Present results with the winning vendor, comparison highlights, and recommendations.

Output Format

📊 Privacy Solution Vendor Scorecard
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Organization: [name]
Industry: [sector]
Budget: [range]
Regulations: [list]

🏆 Top Ranked: [Vendor Name] — [weighted score]

📋 Vendor Comparison:
  [Vendor A]: [total score] — Strongest in [top criteria]
  [Vendor B]: [total score] — Strongest in [top criteria]

📊 Head-to-Head by Category:
  Core Capabilities: [Vendor A] vs [Vendor B]
  Compliance: [Vendor A] vs [Vendor B]
  Technical: [Vendor A] vs [Vendor B]
  Financial: [Vendor A] vs [Vendor B]

🎯 Recommendation:
[Summary recommendation with rationale]

📎 Full report powered by ToolWeb.in

Error Handling

  • If TOOLWEB_API_KEY is not set: Tell the user to get an API key from https://portal.toolweb.in
  • If the API returns 401: API key is invalid or expired
  • If the API returns 422: Check vendor scores format — each must be 1-5 integer
  • If the API returns 429: Rate limit exceeded — wait and retry after 60 seconds

Example Interaction

User: "Help me compare OneTrust and Securiti for our healthcare company"

Agent flow:

  1. Ask: "I'll create a vendor scorecard. A few questions:
    • What's your organization size and privacy budget?
    • Which regulations matter most (HIPAA, GDPR)?
    • How would you score each vendor on a 1-5 scale for areas like functionality, automation, regulatory coverage?"
  2. User provides scores or descriptions (agent maps to 1-5)
  3. Call API with vendor evaluations
  4. Present winner, comparison matrix, and recommendation

Pricing

  • API access via portal.toolweb.in subscription plans
  • Free trial: 5 API calls/day, 50 API calls/month to test the skill
  • Developer: $39/month — 20 calls/day and 500 calls/month
  • Professional: $99/month — 200 calls/day, 5000 calls/month
  • Enterprise: $299/month — 100K calls/day, 1M calls/month

About

Created by ToolWeb.in — a security-focused MicroSaaS platform with 200+ security APIs, built by a CISSP & CISM certified professional. Trusted by security teams in USA, UK, and Europe and we have platforms for "Pay-per-run", "API Gateway", "MCP Server", "OpenClaw", "RapidAPI" for execution and YouTube channel for demos.

Related Skills

  • GDPR Compliance Tracker — GDPR readiness assessment
  • DPDP Act Compliance — India privacy compliance
  • Data Privacy Checklist — 63-control privacy assessment
  • ISO Compliance Gap Analysis — ISO 27701 privacy management
  • Data Breach Impact Calculator — Breach cost estimation

Tips

  • Compare at least 2-3 vendors for a meaningful scorecard
  • Adjust priority_criteria to weight what matters most to your org
  • Use the scoring guide (available via /api/criteria) for consistent scoring
  • Healthcare orgs should prioritize regulatory_coverage and functionality_coverage
  • Use the executive summary for procurement committee presentations
安全使用建议
Do not install this skill until you resolve the naming mismatch. The SKILL.md and README clearly implement a privacy-scorecard that posts data to portal.toolweb.in and requires TOOLWEB_API_KEY, but the package name/slug suggests an unrelated Kubernetes tool. This could be a benign packaging mistake or an attempt to hide purpose. Before installing: 1) Verify the publisher and homepage (portal.toolweb.in) independently (company identity, TLS cert, contact info, privacy policy). 2) Confirm why the package is named 'k8s-network-policy-generator' — ask the publisher or check repo history. 3) If you proceed, test with non-sensitive dummy data and a limited-scope API key. 4) Prefer to create a revocable API key or scoped credentials and rotate/revoke them after testing. 5) If you cannot verify the origin or reason for the mismatch, avoid installing or exposing real organizational data to this skill.
功能分析
Type: OpenClaw Skill Name: k8s-network-policy-generator Version: 1.0.0 The skill exhibits a potential shell injection vulnerability in the SKILL.md workflow, as it instructs the agent to construct a curl command using unsanitized user inputs (e.g., organization_name, budget_range) within a shell string. There is also a significant metadata discrepancy in _meta.json, where the 'slug' (k8s-network-policy-generator) does not match the actual privacy scorecard functionality, and the 'publishedAt' timestamp is set to a future date (2026). While the data collection is aligned with the stated purpose of vendor evaluation via portal.toolweb.in, these technical flaws and inconsistencies are characteristic of poorly constructed or misleading bundles.
能力评估
Purpose & Capability
The skill package is named and sluggified as a Kubernetes Network Policy Generator, but the SKILL.md, README, API endpoint, required env var (TOOLWEB_API_KEY), and workflow are all about a privacy solution/vendor scorecard. This naming/content mismatch is unexplained and suspicious: either a packaging error or intentional mislabeling. Other declared requirements (curl and TOOLWEB_API_KEY) are consistent with the scorecard functionality, but the name/slug inconsistency is a major red flag.
Instruction Scope
The instructions are explicit: gather organization and vendor inputs and POST them to https://portal.toolweb.in/apis/compliance/privacy-scorecard using X-API-Key. They do not instruct reading local files, other environment variables, or system config. Note: the skill will transmit user-provided organizational and vendor details (potentially sensitive) to a third-party endpoint — users should be aware that that data leaves their environment.
Install Mechanism
No install spec or code files are present; this is instruction-only and requires curl on PATH. That is the lowest-risk install mechanism because nothing is written to disk by the skill bundle itself.
Credentials
Only a single API credential (TOOLWEB_API_KEY) is required and is plausibly needed to call the ToolWeb API shown in the instructions. The requested environment access is minimal and proportionate — however, granting this key authorizes the external service to act on the user's behalf, so trust in the service is required.
Persistence & Privilege
The skill does not request always:true and has no config path requirements. It does not appear to modify other skills or system settings. Model/autonomous invocation is enabled (default) but that's normal and not in itself flagged here.
如何使用
  1. 确保已安装 OpenClaw(本地或 Docker 部署)
  2. 在对话框中输入安装命令:/install k8s-network-policy-generator
  3. 安装完成后,直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用 /k8s-network-policy-generator 触发
  4. 根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入,即可获得结构化输出
版本历史
v1.0.0
Initial release of the Privacy Solution Scorecard skill. - Evaluate and compare privacy management vendors across 12 weighted criteria, including functionality, compliance, cost, and stability. - Interactive workflow to gather organizational context, priorities, and detailed vendor scores. - Returns detailed scorecards, side-by-side comparison matrix, tailored recommendations, and an executive summary. - Supports comparisons of major vendors (OneTrust, BigID, TrustArc, Securiti, etc.) for RFPs, platform selection, or business cases. - Requires TOOLWEB_API_KEY and curl; outputs follow a clear board-ready report template. - Built by a CISSP/CISM certified security professional; integrates with https://portal.toolweb.in
元数据
Slug k8s-network-policy-generator
版本 1.0.0
许可证 MIT-0
累计安装 0
当前安装数 0
历史版本数 1
常见问题

Kubernetes Network Policy Generator 是什么?

Evaluate and compare privacy solution vendors with a weighted scorecard across 12 criteria. Use when selecting privacy management software, comparing data pr... 它是一个面向 Claude Code / OpenClaw 的 AI Agent Skill 插件,目前累计下载 203 次。

如何安装 Kubernetes Network Policy Generator?

在 OpenClaw 或 Claude Code 对话框中运行命令「/install k8s-network-policy-generator」即可一键安装,无需额外配置。

Kubernetes Network Policy Generator 是免费的吗?

是的,Kubernetes Network Policy Generator 完全免费,采用 MIT-0 许可证,可自由下载、安装和使用。

Kubernetes Network Policy Generator 支持哪些平台?

Kubernetes Network Policy Generator 跨平台运行,可在任意部署了 OpenClaw / Claude Code 的环境中使用(linux, darwin, win32)。

谁开发了 Kubernetes Network Policy Generator?

由 ToolWeb(@krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd)开发并维护,当前版本 v1.0.0。

💬 留言讨论