/install afrexai-tokenomics
Token Economics Analyzer
Evaluate token and digital asset economics for business decisions. Covers utility tokens, governance tokens, loyalty points, and tokenized assets.
When to Use
- Evaluating a token-based product or partnership
- Designing tokenomics for a new product launch
- Assessing token treasury risk exposure
- Due diligence on token-incentivized vendor platforms
Framework
1. Token Classification (5 Types)
| Type | Examples | Key Risk | Business Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utility | API credits, compute tokens | Demand volatility | Pay-per-use vendor pricing |
| Governance | DAO votes, protocol tokens | Concentration risk | Vendor influence, roadmap control |
| Payment | Stablecoins, settlement tokens | Regulatory, counterparty | Cross-border payments, payroll |
| Security | Revenue-share tokens, equity tokens | Securities law compliance | Fundraising, employee comp |
| Loyalty/Reward | Points, cashback tokens | Liability accounting | Customer retention, engagement |
2. Tokenomics Health Score (0-100)
Score each dimension 0-20:
Supply Mechanics (0-20)
- Fixed vs inflationary supply
- Emission schedule and vesting
- Burn mechanisms
- Current circulating vs total supply ratio
Demand Drivers (0-20)
- Real utility (not just speculation)
- Number of active use cases
- Revenue correlation
- Network effect strength
Distribution (0-20)
- Team/insider allocation (red flag if >30%)
- Vesting schedules for large holders
- Concentration (top 10 wallets %)
- Public vs private sale ratio
Governance (0-20)
- Voting mechanism fairness
- Proposal threshold accessibility
- Treasury management transparency
- Fork/exit rights
Regulatory Posture (0-20)
- Howey test assessment
- Jurisdiction clarity
- KYC/AML compliance
- Tax treatment documentation
Scoring:
- 80-100: Strong fundamentals, proceed with confidence
- 60-79: Acceptable with risk mitigation
- 40-59: Significant concerns, negotiate protections
- Below 40: Walk away or demand restructuring
3. Business Decision Matrix
Should We Accept This Token as Payment?
- Daily volume > 10x your expected monthly receipts? Yes
- Listed on 3+ regulated exchanges? Yes
- Stablecoin or pegged? Lower risk
- Score above 60? Proceed with hedging strategy
Should We Hold Token Treasury?
- Never hold >5% of company liquid assets in any single token
- Convert to stablecoin or fiat within 48 hours unless strategic hold
- Set automatic rebalancing triggers at +/-15%
Should We Launch a Token?
- Do you have real utility that requires a token? (Not just fundraising)
- Can you sustain demand without speculation?
- Legal budget of $50K-$200K for compliance?
- If all three = no, use traditional pricing instead
4. Vendor Token Lock-In Assessment
When a vendor uses token-based pricing:
- Calculate true USD cost per unit over 12 months
- Compare to non-token alternatives
- Assess token price volatility impact on budget
- Check if vendor holds majority supply (price manipulation risk)
- Review token unlock schedule for supply shock risk
5. Red Flags (Immediate Walk-Away)
- Team allocation >40% with \x3C2 year vesting
- No audit of smart contracts
- Anonymous team with no legal entity
- Token required but adds no functional value
- Circular tokenomics (token rewards for holding token)
- No clear revenue model beyond token sales
- Jurisdiction shopping to avoid regulation
6. Cost Framework
| Action | Small Business | Mid-Market | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Token evaluation (one-time) | $2K-$5K | $5K-$15K | $15K-$50K |
| Tokenomics design | $15K-$40K | $40K-$120K | $120K-$500K |
| Legal compliance (US) | $25K-$75K | $75K-$200K | $200K-$1M+ |
| Smart contract audit | $10K-$30K | $30K-$80K | $80K-$250K |
| Ongoing treasury management | $2K-$8K/mo | $8K-$25K/mo | $25K-$100K/mo |
7. Industry Applications
| Industry | Token Use Case | Risk Level | ROI Potential |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech | Payment rails, lending | High (regulatory) | $500K-$5M/yr |
| SaaS | Usage-based compute credits | Medium | $100K-$800K/yr |
| Ecommerce | Loyalty programs, cross-border | Medium | $200K-$1.2M/yr |
| Real Estate | Tokenized fractional ownership | High (securities) | $1M-$10M+ |
| Healthcare | Data marketplace tokens | High (HIPAA + securities) | $300K-$2M/yr |
| Legal | Smart contract automation | Medium | $150K-$600K/yr |
| Manufacturing | Supply chain provenance | Low-Medium | $200K-$900K/yr |
| Construction | Milestone payment tokens | Medium | $100K-$500K/yr |
| Recruitment | Credential verification | Low | $50K-$300K/yr |
| Professional Services | Client billing tokens | Low-Medium | $80K-$400K/yr |
Output Format
Present findings as:
- Token Classification + Health Score (0-100)
- Business Decision (accept/hold/launch/walk away)
- Risk factors with mitigation steps
- Cost estimates for recommended path
- 90-day action plan
Resources
- AI Revenue Leak Calculator — Find where your business is losing money to inefficient processes
- Industry Context Packs — $47 per industry, covers tokenomics within each vertical
- Agent Setup Wizard — Deploy your own analysis agent in 5 minutes
- 确保已安装 OpenClaw(本地或 Docker 部署)
- 在对话框中输入安装命令:
/install afrexai-tokenomics - 安装完成后,直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用
/afrexai-tokenomics触发 - 根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入,即可获得结构化输出
Token Economics Analyzer 是什么?
Analyze token types and score tokenomics health to guide acceptance, holding, launching, or rejecting tokens with risk and cost insights. 它是一个面向 Claude Code / OpenClaw 的 AI Agent Skill 插件,目前累计下载 491 次。
如何安装 Token Economics Analyzer?
在 OpenClaw 或 Claude Code 对话框中运行命令「/install afrexai-tokenomics」即可一键安装,无需额外配置。
Token Economics Analyzer 是免费的吗?
是的,Token Economics Analyzer 完全免费(开源免费),可自由下载、安装和使用。
Token Economics Analyzer 支持哪些平台?
Token Economics Analyzer 跨平台运行,可在任意部署了 OpenClaw / Claude Code 的环境中使用(cross-platform)。
谁开发了 Token Economics Analyzer?
由 1kalin(@1kalin)开发并维护,当前版本 v1.0.0。