← 返回 Skills 市场
1kalin

Cloud Cost Audit

作者 1kalin · GitHub ↗ · v1.0.0
cross-platform ✓ 安全检测通过
507
总下载
0
收藏
1
当前安装
1
版本数
在 OpenClaw 中安装
/install afrexai-cloud-cost-audit
功能描述
Analyze multi-cloud spend data to identify waste, rightsizing, reserved instance savings, and generate a prioritized 90-day cost optimization roadmap.
使用说明 (SKILL.md)

Cloud Cost Optimization Audit

Analyze cloud infrastructure spend across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Identify waste, rightsizing opportunities, and reserved instance savings.

What This Skill Does

When given cloud spend data (billing exports, cost explorer screenshots, or manual input), this skill:

  1. Categorizes spend across 8 cost domains (compute, storage, networking, databases, AI/ML, observability, security, licensing)
  2. Identifies waste patterns using 12 common anti-patterns
  3. Calculates savings with specific dollar amounts per optimization
  4. Prioritizes actions by effort vs. impact (quick wins → strategic moves)
  5. Generates executive summary with 90-day roadmap

Cost Domains & Benchmarks (2026)

1. Compute (typically 40-55% of total)

  • Idle instances: >30% idle = waste. Benchmark: \x3C10% idle capacity
  • Rightsizing: 60% of instances are oversized by 1+ size category
  • Spot/preemptible: Batch workloads not on spot = 60-80% overpay
  • Reserved/savings plans: On-demand for steady-state = 30-50% overpay
  • Container density: \x3C40% CPU utilization on nodes = poor bin-packing

2. Storage (typically 10-20%)

  • Tiering: Data not accessed in 90 days still on hot storage = 60-80% overpay
  • Snapshot sprawl: Orphaned snapshots older than 30 days
  • Duplicate data: Cross-region replication without business justification
  • Object lifecycle: No lifecycle policies = guaranteed bloat

3. Networking (typically 8-15%)

  • Cross-AZ traffic: Unnecessary data transfer between zones ($0.01-0.02/GB)
  • NAT gateway abuse: High-throughput through NAT vs. VPC endpoints
  • CDN miss rate: >20% miss rate = CDN config issue
  • Egress optimization: No committed use discounts on egress

4. Databases (typically 10-20%)

  • Over-provisioned RDS/Cloud SQL: Multi-AZ for dev/staging environments
  • Read replica sprawl: Replicas with \x3C5% query load
  • DynamoDB/Cosmos over-provisioning: Provisioned capacity 3x+ actual usage
  • License waste: Commercial DB when open-source works

5. AI/ML Infrastructure (growing — 5-25%)

  • GPU idle time: Training instances running 24/7 for 4hr/day workloads
  • Inference over-provisioning: GPU instances for CPU-viable inference
  • Model storage: Old model versions consuming storage
  • API costs: Frontier model API calls without caching layer

6. Observability (typically 3-8%)

  • Log ingestion bloat: Debug logs in production, duplicate log streams
  • Metric cardinality: High-cardinality custom metrics ($$$)
  • Trace sampling: 100% trace sampling when 10% suffices
  • Retention overkill: 13-month retention for non-compliance data

7. Security (typically 2-5%)

  • WAF rule bloat: Managed rule groups not actively tuned
  • Key management: KMS keys for non-sensitive data
  • Compliance scanning: Overlapping tools doing same checks

8. Licensing (typically 5-15%)

  • Shelfware: Paid seats not logged in 60+ days
  • Duplicate tools: Multiple tools solving same problem
  • Enterprise tiers: Enterprise features unused, paying enterprise price

12 Waste Anti-Patterns

# Pattern Typical Waste Fix Effort
1 Zombie resources (stopped but attached) 5-15% of bill Low
2 Over-provisioned instances 15-30% compute Medium
3 No reserved capacity strategy 25-40% compute Medium
4 Hot storage hoarding 40-70% storage Low
5 Cross-AZ data transfer abuse 10-30% network Medium
6 Dev/staging mirrors production 20-40% of envs Low
7 Orphaned snapshots/AMIs 3-8% storage Low
8 Log ingestion without sampling 30-60% observability Low
9 GPU instances for CPU workloads 70-85% compute Medium
10 No spot/preemptible for batch 60-80% batch Medium
11 Shelfware licenses 20-40% licensing Low
12 No tagging = no accountability Unmeasurable High

Savings Estimation Framework

For each finding, calculate:

Annual Savings = (Current Cost - Optimized Cost) × 12
Implementation Cost = Engineering Hours × Loaded Rate
ROI = (Annual Savings - Implementation Cost) / Implementation Cost
Payback Period = Implementation Cost / (Annual Savings / 12)

Typical Savings by Company Size

Company Size Monthly Cloud Spend Typical Waste % Annual Savings
Startup (5-15) $2K-$15K 35-50% $8K-$90K
Growth (15-50) $15K-$80K 25-40% $45K-$384K
Mid-market (50-200) $80K-$500K 20-35% $192K-$2.1M
Enterprise (200+) $500K-$5M+ 15-25% $900K-$15M+

Output Format

Generate a report with:

  1. Executive Summary: Total spend, waste identified, savings potential, top 3 quick wins
  2. Domain Breakdown: Spend per domain vs. benchmarks
  3. Findings Table: Each finding with current cost, optimized cost, savings, effort, priority
  4. 90-Day Roadmap: Week 1-2 quick wins, Week 3-6 medium effort, Week 7-12 strategic
  5. Governance Recommendations: Tagging strategy, budget alerts, review cadence

Usage

Provide your cloud billing data in any format:

  • AWS Cost Explorer export / Azure Cost Management / GCP Billing
  • Monthly bill summary
  • Architecture description with approximate sizing
  • Or just describe your stack and team size for estimates

The agent will analyze and produce the full optimization report.


Want Industry-Specific Cloud Optimization?

Different industries have different compliance, data residency, and workload patterns that change the optimization calculus entirely.

Get your industry context pack — pre-built frameworks for Fintech, Healthcare, Legal, SaaS, Ecommerce, Construction, Real Estate, Recruitment, Manufacturing, and Professional Services.

🛒 Browse packs: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/ 🧮 Calculate your AI savings: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/ 🤖 Set up your agent: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/

Bundle deals:

  • Pick 3 packs: $97
  • All 10 packs: $197
  • Everything bundle: $247
安全使用建议
This instruction-only skill appears coherent and low-risk, but exercise standard caution before sharing cost data. Do not provide live cloud credentials or API keys to the agent. If you must upload billing exports or screenshots, remove or redact account IDs, access keys, or any embedded credentials. Verify any external links (the SKILL.md references afrexai-cto.github.io) before following them. If you prefer the agent to fetch data from your cloud provider, require a vetted, least-privilege integration (not free-form credentials). If the skill's source is unknown and you need stronger assurance, ask the publisher for provenance or use sanitized sample data first.
功能分析
Type: OpenClaw Skill Name: afrexai-cloud-cost-audit Version: 1.0.0 The skill bundle describes a cloud cost optimization audit tool. All files (metadata, SKILL.md, README.md) consistently outline the skill's purpose, expected inputs (cloud spend data), and outputs (optimization report). There are no instructions for the AI agent to perform unauthorized actions, access sensitive system data, exfiltrate information, or execute external commands. The external URLs provided in the markdown files are informational/marketing links for the user, not commands for the agent to interact with. No prompt injection attempts or obfuscation were detected.
能力评估
Purpose & Capability
Name/description (multi-cloud cost audit) matches the SKILL.md: analysis of billing exports, screenshots, or manual inputs to identify waste and produce a roadmap. It does not request unrelated credentials, binaries, or filesystem access.
Instruction Scope
All runtime instructions operate on user-supplied billing data (exports, screenshots, architecture descriptions). The SKILL.md does not instruct the agent to fetch cloud provider APIs or read unrelated system files. Note: it encourages users to upload billing exports/screenshots which may contain sensitive account identifiers or cost data — users should sanitize or redact secrets before sharing.
Install Mechanism
No install spec and no code files are included — instruction-only skill with no packages or downloads. This minimizes installation risk.
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables, credentials, or config paths. That aligns with the stated approach of operating on user-provided data rather than accessing cloud accounts directly.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and the skill is user-invocable. It does not request persistent system presence or modify other skills or system settings.
如何使用
  1. 确保已安装 OpenClaw(本地或 Docker 部署)
  2. 在对话框中输入安装命令:/install afrexai-cloud-cost-audit
  3. 安装完成后,直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用 /afrexai-cloud-cost-audit 触发
  4. 根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入,即可获得结构化输出
版本历史
v1.0.0
Initial release of afrexai-cloud-cost-audit - Provides comprehensive cloud cost optimization audit for AWS, Azure, and GCP. - Analyzes submitted spend data, identifies waste, rightsizing, and reserved instance opportunities. - Categorizes spend across 8 cost domains and checks against industry benchmarks. - Detects 12 common cloud waste anti-patterns with estimated savings and implementation efforts. - Generates an executive summary, prioritized findings, and a 90-day action roadmap. - Includes industry-specific optimization packs and savings estimation framework.
元数据
Slug afrexai-cloud-cost-audit
版本 1.0.0
许可证
累计安装 1
当前安装数 1
历史版本数 1
常见问题

Cloud Cost Audit 是什么?

Analyze multi-cloud spend data to identify waste, rightsizing, reserved instance savings, and generate a prioritized 90-day cost optimization roadmap. 它是一个面向 Claude Code / OpenClaw 的 AI Agent Skill 插件,目前累计下载 507 次。

如何安装 Cloud Cost Audit?

在 OpenClaw 或 Claude Code 对话框中运行命令「/install afrexai-cloud-cost-audit」即可一键安装,无需额外配置。

Cloud Cost Audit 是免费的吗?

是的,Cloud Cost Audit 完全免费(开源免费),可自由下载、安装和使用。

Cloud Cost Audit 支持哪些平台?

Cloud Cost Audit 跨平台运行,可在任意部署了 OpenClaw / Claude Code 的环境中使用(cross-platform)。

谁开发了 Cloud Cost Audit?

由 1kalin(@1kalin)开发并维护,当前版本 v1.0.0。

💬 留言讨论