← 返回 Skills 市场
mindbomber

AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill

作者 mindbomber · GitHub ↗ · v1.0.0 · MIT-0
cross-platform ✓ 安全检测通过
65
总下载
1
收藏
0
当前安装
1
版本数
在 OpenClaw 中安装
/install aana-workflow-readiness-check
功能描述
Evaluates if a multi-step workflow has sufficient information, permission, tools, evidence, and safety to proceed or needs clarification or review.
使用说明 (SKILL.md)

AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill

Use this skill when an OpenClaw-style agent is about to begin a workflow, plan, multi-step task, tool sequence, external action, file operation, research task, customer action, code change, booking, purchase, or high-impact decision.

This is an instruction-only skill. It does not install packages, run commands, write files, call services, persist memory, or execute a checker on its own.

Core Principle

Before starting a workflow, the agent should confirm it has enough information, permission, tools, evidence, and safe boundaries to proceed.

The agent should separate:

  • workflows that are ready to start,
  • workflows that need clarification,
  • workflows that need explicit permission,
  • workflows that need evidence or retrieval first,
  • workflows that need a tool or credential the agent does not have,
  • workflows that need human, professional, or admin review,
  • workflows that should not start.

When To Use

Use this skill before:

  • starting a multi-step workflow,
  • calling tools or connectors,
  • changing files, code, settings, accounts, or production systems,
  • sending, publishing, uploading, booking, buying, subscribing, renewing, refunding, or transferring,
  • answering with material factual, legal, medical, financial, safety, policy, or customer impact,
  • using private data, user records, logs, inboxes, calendars, drives, databases, repositories, or account information,
  • continuing from an ambiguous or underspecified request.

Readiness Categories

Classify the workflow:

  • ready: enough information, permission, tools, and evidence are available.
  • needs_information: required inputs or constraints are missing.
  • needs_permission: approval or authorization is missing.
  • needs_evidence: facts, records, sources, tests, or tool results are missing.
  • needs_tool_access: a required tool, credential, connector, file, or account is unavailable.
  • needs_review: human, professional, admin, or policy review is required.
  • not_safe: the workflow should not start.

AANA Readiness Loop

  1. Identify the workflow and intended outcome.
  2. Define the minimum completion criteria.
  3. Check required information: inputs, constraints, dates, targets, identities, amounts, policies, and success criteria.
  4. Check permission: user approval, ownership, authority, target scope, and external-action consent.
  5. Check tools: required tools, access, credentials, permissions, and safer alternatives.
  6. Check evidence: available facts, sources, records, test results, citations, and uncertainty.
  7. Check risk: private data, financial impact, legal/medical/safety impact, irreversible actions, production impact, and public exposure.
  8. Choose action: start, ask, retrieve, request approval, route to review, narrow, or refuse.

Required Pre-Workflow Checks

Before starting, verify:

  • user request,
  • workflow summary,
  • intended outcome,
  • completion criteria,
  • required information,
  • permission status,
  • tool/access status,
  • evidence status,
  • risk level,
  • first safe step.

Information Rules

Do not start a workflow when:

  • the target is unclear,
  • required dates, amounts, recipients, files, accounts, systems, or success criteria are missing,
  • the user has not selected between materially different options,
  • the workflow could affect another person or organization and identity/authority is unclear.

Ask a focused question instead of guessing.

Permission Rules

Require explicit approval before starting when the workflow:

  • changes files, accounts, code, settings, permissions, or production systems,
  • sends, publishes, posts, uploads, books, buys, subscribes, renews, refunds, transfers, cancels, deletes, or overwrites,
  • accesses private data beyond what the user clearly provided,
  • affects money, legal rights, health, safety, employment, housing, education, insurance, reputation, or public records.

Approval should name the workflow, target scope, and first state-changing step.

Tool Rules

Do not start a tool-dependent workflow when:

  • the required tool is unavailable,
  • the target scope cannot be limited,
  • credentials or permissions are missing,
  • the tool would expose unrelated private data,
  • a safer read-only, preview, draft, or dry-run step is available and has not been used.

Prefer a narrow readiness step before a broad action.

Evidence Rules

Do not start or complete an evidence-dependent workflow when:

  • key facts are unsupported,
  • sources are missing or stale,
  • test claims are unrun,
  • policy claims are unverified,
  • customer/account facts are not available,
  • legal, medical, financial, or safety conclusions lack qualified evidence.

Retrieve, ask, or route to review before acting.

Review Payload

When using a configured AANA checker, send only a minimal redacted review payload:

  • user_request
  • workflow_summary
  • intended_outcome
  • readiness_status
  • information_status
  • permission_status
  • tool_status
  • evidence_status
  • risk_level
  • recommended_action

Do not include raw secrets, credentials, full private records, full logs, full transcripts, full account records, or unrelated private data when a redacted summary is enough.

Decision Rule

  • If information, permission, tools, evidence, and risk boundaries are sufficient, start with the first safe step.
  • If required inputs are missing, ask.
  • If facts or records are missing, retrieve with the narrowest safe scope.
  • If authorization is missing, request explicit approval.
  • If tools or credentials are unavailable, explain the blocker or choose a safer available path.
  • If the workflow is high-impact, irreversible, professional, production, or policy-sensitive, route to review.
  • If the workflow is unsafe, unauthorized, deceptive, or harmful, refuse unsafe parts.
  • If a checker is unavailable or untrusted, use manual readiness review.

Output Pattern

For readiness-sensitive work, prefer:

AANA readiness check:
- Workflow: ...
- Intended outcome: ...
- Information: sufficient / missing / ambiguous / conflicting / unknown
- Permission: explicit / implicit_low_risk / required / denied / unclear
- Tools: available / unavailable / limited / unsafe_scope / not_needed
- Evidence: sufficient / partial / missing / stale / conflicting / unknown
- Risk: low / moderate / high / irreversible / private / production / professional / unknown
- Decision: start / ask / retrieve / request_approval / route_to_review / narrow / refuse

Do not include this check in the user-facing answer unless clarification, approval, retrieval, review, or a readiness blocker needs to be explained.

安全使用建议
This skill appears safe to install as a checklist-style guardrail. Before using any optional AANA checker, confirm it is an approved integration and send only the redacted summary fields described by the skill.
功能分析
Type: OpenClaw Skill Name: aana-workflow-readiness-check Version: 1.0.0 The skill is a purely instructional bundle designed to enforce safety and readiness checks before an agent executes high-impact workflows. It contains no executable code, scripts, or external dependencies, and its instructions in SKILL.md and manifest.json explicitly forbid the handling of sensitive data such as API keys, passwords, or private records, focusing instead on risk mitigation and permission verification.
能力标签
cryptocan-make-purchases
能力评估
Purpose & Capability
The stated purpose and artifacts are coherent: the skill is a pre-workflow readiness check and does not provide code, tools, credentials, or direct action capability.
Instruction Scope
The instructions are broad, but they restrict action by requiring clarification, evidence, explicit approval, or review before risky workflows rather than encouraging unsafe execution.
Install Mechanism
There is no install spec, no dependencies, no binaries, and no code files; the manifest declares this as an instruction-only skill.
Credentials
SKILL.md allows an optional configured AANA checker and says to send only a minimal redacted review payload; this is purpose-aligned, but users should understand that summaries may be shared with an approved checker if configured.
Persistence & Privilege
The manifest says the skill does not write files, execute commands, persist memory, or require credentials, and no artifact contradicts that.
如何使用
  1. 确保已安装 OpenClaw(本地或 Docker 部署)
  2. 在对话框中输入安装命令:/install aana-workflow-readiness-check
  3. 安装完成后,直接呼叫该 Skill 的名称或使用 /aana-workflow-readiness-check 触发
  4. 根据 Skill 的参数说明提供必要输入,即可获得结构化输出
版本历史
v1.0.0
Initial release of the AANA Workflow Readiness Check skill. - Provides instruction-only guidelines for readiness checks before workflows or high-impact actions. - Defines categories and rules for information, permission, tools, evidence, and risk assessment. - Outlines a step-by-step readiness loop and decision framework. - Specifies when to ask for clarification, request approval, retrieve evidence, or refuse action. - Includes structured output template for recording readiness checks.
元数据
Slug aana-workflow-readiness-check
版本 1.0.0
许可证 MIT-0
累计安装 0
当前安装数 0
历史版本数 1
常见问题

AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill 是什么?

Evaluates if a multi-step workflow has sufficient information, permission, tools, evidence, and safety to proceed or needs clarification or review. 它是一个面向 Claude Code / OpenClaw 的 AI Agent Skill 插件,目前累计下载 65 次。

如何安装 AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill?

在 OpenClaw 或 Claude Code 对话框中运行命令「/install aana-workflow-readiness-check」即可一键安装,无需额外配置。

AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill 是免费的吗?

是的,AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill 完全免费,采用 MIT-0 许可证,可自由下载、安装和使用。

AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill 支持哪些平台?

AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill 跨平台运行,可在任意部署了 OpenClaw / Claude Code 的环境中使用(cross-platform)。

谁开发了 AANA Workflow Readiness Check Skill?

由 mindbomber(@mindbomber)开发并维护,当前版本 v1.0.0。

💬 留言讨论