← Back to Skills Marketplace
jianshuo

Wjs Auditing Project

by Jian Shuo Wang · GitHub ↗ · v0.1.0 · MIT-0
cross-platform ✓ Security Clean
65
Downloads
0
Stars
0
Active Installs
1
Versions
Install in OpenClaw
/install wjs-auditing-project
Description
Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holis...
README (SKILL.md)

wjs-auditing-project

Overview

Holistic project-state audit. Find everything that's stalled, broken, or diverged from the plan — then fix it together after the user confirms the checklist.

Hard two-phase split:

  1. Investigate → present grouped checklist (read-only; no commits, no merges, no pushes)
  2. Fix — only after the user explicitly confirms what to do

Never collapse the phases. The user wants to see the full picture before any action. "Just go ahead and fix everything" is fine as confirmation, but you still produce the checklist first so they can scan it.

When to use

  • "看看现在的项目到底出了什么问题" / "make it right" / "what's broken"
  • "为什么我的反馈还没上线"
  • "为什么很久没有新 build / 没提交 App Store"
  • "有没有 PR / 分支没合"
  • Returning to a project after time away
  • Before a release / TestFlight push, to make sure nothing is dangling

Phase 1 — Investigate (parallel)

Run all the read-only checks in one message with parallel Bash calls. Don't ask the user which to run; run them all. Many will return "nothing wrong" — that's fine, those just don't show up in the checklist.

A. Working tree & stashes

  • git status — uncommitted work?
  • git stash list — forgotten stashes?
  • git branch -vv — local branches, ahead/behind tracking
  • git log --oneline main..HEAD — what's on current branch not in main
  • git fetch origin --prune && git log --oneline HEAD..@{upstream} — what's on remote not local
  • git branch -r --merged main and git branch -r --no-merged main — remote branches still floating

B. Open / draft PRs

  • gh pr list --state open --json number,title,isDraft,mergeable,mergeStateStatus,updatedAt,author,headRefName
  • For any PR older than 7 days OR with mergeStateStatusCLEAN: capture the failing checks via gh pr checks \x3Cnum>
  • Auto-merge bot PRs (per memory: in-app feedback → @claude PR → auto-merge): gh pr list --author "app/claude" --state all --limit 20 — any merged but not yet in a TestFlight build? Any stuck open?

C. CI / GitHub Actions

  • gh run list --limit 20 --json conclusion,name,headBranch,createdAt,databaseId,event
  • gh run list --status failure --limit 10 — failures specifically
  • For each failure on main or on an open PR's branch: gh run view \x3Cid> --log-failed | tail -100 to capture the actual error

D. Released vs unreleased work (iOS specifics for Cathier)

  • grep -E "MARKETING_VERSION|CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION" *.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj | sort -u — current version + build number
  • git tag --sort=-creatordate | head -5 — recent release tags
  • git log --oneline \x3Clast-tag>..main — commits since last tagged release
  • Check fastlane/ config and fastlane/report.xml (if present) for last pilot / deliver invocation
  • git log -1 --format="%ai %s" -- fastlane/ — last fastlane change
  • git log --all --grep="bump\|version\|build" -10 --oneline — recent version bumps

E. Plan drift

  • Read TODOS.md, CHANGELOG.md, APP_STORE_SUBMISSION_GUIDE.md, ROADMAP.md, docs/plan*.md if any exist
  • Cross-reference plan items against shipped commits — what's listed but not done? What has a date that's already passed?
  • grep -rn "TODO\|FIXME\|XXX" --include="*.swift" . — drift markers in source

F. App / system logs

  • ls -t ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Cathier* 2>/dev/null | head -5 — recent crash reports for the app
  • log show --predicate 'process == "Cathier"' --last 1d --style compact 2>/dev/null | grep -iE "error|fault" | head -20 — recent runtime errors (skip silently if no install on this Mac)
  • ls -t ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/*/Logs/Build/*.xcactivitylog 2>/dev/null | head -3 — last build attempts (existence + mtime; don't try to parse)

G. User-feedback specifically

Per memory: in-app feedback creates @claude PRs that auto-merge into main. To answer "why isn't my feedback in the app":

  1. Was a PR created from feedback? (gh pr list --author "app/claude" --state all)
  2. Was it merged? (check PR status)
  3. Is there a TestFlight/App Store build newer than the merge commit? If 3 = no, that's the answer: merged into main but never built/submitted.

Presenting the checklist

Output one grouped markdown checklist. Each item must contain: what's wrong, evidence (numbers/dates/file paths), and a proposed action phrased so the user can say yes/no. Group by urgency:

## What I found

### 🔴 Blocking (these gate everything else)
- [ ] PR #42 "Add jokes redesign": 3 failing checks (SwiftLint, build, tests). Last commit 2026-04-30. → Read logs, fix, push?
- [ ] main is 7 commits ahead of last tag v1.4.0 (2026-03-22). No TestFlight build since then. → Tag v1.5.0 and prep release notes?

### 🟡 Open work
- [ ] Local branch `home-simplification` has 5 commits, no open PR, last activity 2026-05-08. → Open PR against main?
- [ ] Stash "WIP: brain trainer stats" from 2026-04-02. → Show diff and decide drop/apply?

### 🟢 Plan drift (TODOS.md / fastlane)
- [ ] TODOS.md line 14: "Submit App Store build by 2026-04-30" — overdue 11d, no `fastlane pilot` invocation since 2026-03-12.
- [ ] TODOS.md line 22: "Hook up haptics on streak page" — no matching commit on main.
- [ ] 2 auto-merged @claude PRs (#88, #91) from in-app feedback merged after last TestFlight build — user feedback shipped to main but not to TestFlight.

### Logs / errors
- [ ] 23 errors in last 24h matching "NSURLErrorDomain -1009" (offline path) — investigate or note as expected?
- [ ] 1 crash report from 2026-05-10 in DiagnosticReports — pull stack and triage?

### Looks fine
- Working tree clean, no orphan branches on origin, no failed CI on main this week.

End with: "想让我把这些都修好吗?还是挑一部分?或者先讨论某一项?"

Phase 2 — Fix (only after user confirms)

Once the user confirms (full set, subset, or "all green and yellow but not the App Store one"):

  1. TaskCreate a todo per confirmed item
  2. Order: failing CI → branch merges → tags → version bumps → release notes → build prompt
  3. Work them one at a time; mark done immediately, not in batches
  4. After each fix, re-run the corresponding check from phase 1 to verify it's actually resolved
  5. End with a short summary: fixed / skipped / requires-human

What you can do autonomously

  • Read failing CI logs, edit code, push the fix
  • Open a PR with gh pr create for an unpushed branch
  • Re-trigger a failed run with gh run rerun \x3Cid> after diagnosing why it failed (don't blindly rerun flaky-looking failures — find the root cause first)
  • Merge a clean PR (gh pr merge --squash --auto) if the user said yes for that specific PR
  • Bump MARKETING_VERSION / CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION in project.pbxproj
  • Add a CHANGELOG entry, tag the release with git tag (don't push tag until user confirms)
  • Drop or pop a stash after showing the diff

What requires the user to act

Print the exact command they should run with a leading !:

  • ! fastlane pilot upload — App Store / TestFlight submission signs the binary; needs them
  • ! open Cathier.xcodeproj — anything that needs Xcode archive UI
  • Anything destructive: git reset --hard, git push --force, deleting branches

Common findings → standard fixes

Finding Standard fix
Local branch ahead of main, no PR Rebase on main, push, gh pr create
PR failing CI on same step twice Read failed log, fix root cause, don't blindly rerun
Unreleased commits + stale TestFlight Bump build number, tag, write release notes, prompt user to run fastlane pilot
Stash >30 days, unclear context Show git stash show -p \x3Cn> to user, ask drop/apply
TODOS.md item with no commit Surface to user — descoped or forgotten? Don't assume
Auto-merged feedback PRs newer than last build The fix is a new TestFlight build, not more code changes
fastlane/ untouched but plan says App Store deadline passed Surface the deadline + last submission date; user decides priority

Red flags — STOP

Thought Reality
"I'll just fix it and skip the checklist" No. The user asked specifically for the audit-then-confirm flow.
"The PR looks safe to merge, I'll do it" Only if they confirmed this PR by name in their reply.
"I'll force-push to clean up history" Never without explicit per-action confirmation.
"Let me close that stuck PR to tidy up" Investigate first; the work may be salvageable.
"I'll submit to App Store on their behalf" Never. Print the ! fastlane … command and stop.
"The crash report is probably nothing" Pull the stack and surface it. Let the user decide.
"Plan item is old, must be obsolete" Ask. Don't delete plan entries.

Notes specific to this user / Cathier

  • Default working dir: /Users/jianshuo/code/Cathier. Honor wherever invoked.
  • Cathier is a SwiftUI iOS app with fastlane/ for App Store / TestFlight.
  • Plan source of truth lives in TODOS.md and APP_STORE_SUBMISSION_GUIDE.md. Read both.
  • Memory note: in-app feedback → app/claude opens a PR → auto-merge to main. So "why isn't my feedback in the app" usually means the merge happened but no new build was cut. Check TestFlight build date vs PR merge date before investigating the code.
  • gh is authenticated. fastlane is installed (Gemfile present).
  • DESIGN.md is the visual source of truth; never propose UI fixes that conflict with it without flagging.
Usage Guidance
Install/use this only if you want an agent to inspect the current project, GitHub PRs/actions, release state, TODO/roadmap files, and Cathier-related local logs. Check that you are in the right repository and logged into the right GitHub account, then review the checklist before approving any changes.
Capability Analysis
Type: OpenClaw Skill Name: wjs-auditing-project Version: 0.1.0 The skill is a comprehensive project auditing tool designed for an iOS development environment (specifically the 'Cathier' app). It performs read-only investigations of Git state, GitHub PRs/Actions, and local system logs to identify stalled work or plan drift, requiring explicit user confirmation before performing any corrective actions like merging or pushing code. The instructions in SKILL.md emphasize a strict two-phase workflow and include safety constraints against destructive actions, such as force-pushing or autonomous App Store submissions.
Capability Assessment
Purpose & Capability
The stated purpose is a holistic project audit, and the listed git, GitHub, Xcode, fastlane, plan-file, and Cathier log checks fit that purpose. The behavior is sensitive but disclosed and mostly read-only.
Instruction Scope
The skill enforces a two-phase flow with investigation first and fixes only after explicit user confirmation, but it also tells the agent to run all investigation commands without asking per check.
Install Mechanism
There is no install spec, no code files, and no package or download mechanism shown.
Credentials
The commands are macOS/iOS/Cathier-project-specific and include local log inspection; this is proportionate for the described app-audit workflow but may fail or be inappropriate outside that environment.
Persistence & Privilege
No persistence or background behavior is shown. The GitHub CLI checks likely use the user's existing GitHub authentication, so users should ensure the correct account and repository context are active.
How to Use
  1. Make sure OpenClaw is installed (local or Docker)
  2. Run the install command in chat: /install wjs-auditing-project
  3. After installation, invoke the skill by name or use /wjs-auditing-project
  4. Provide required inputs per the skill's parameter spec and get structured output
Version History
v0.1.0
Initial release
Metadata
Slug wjs-auditing-project
Version 0.1.0
License MIT-0
All-time Installs 0
Active Installs 0
Total Versions 1
Frequently Asked Questions

What is Wjs Auditing Project?

Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holis... It is an AI Agent Skill for Claude Code / OpenClaw, with 65 downloads so far.

How do I install Wjs Auditing Project?

Run "/install wjs-auditing-project" in the OpenClaw or Claude Code chat to install it in one step — no extra setup required.

Is Wjs Auditing Project free?

Yes, Wjs Auditing Project is completely free, licensed under MIT-0. You can download, install and use it at no cost.

Which platforms does Wjs Auditing Project support?

Wjs Auditing Project is cross-platform and runs anywhere OpenClaw / Claude Code is available (cross-platform).

Who created Wjs Auditing Project?

It is built and maintained by Jian Shuo Wang (@jianshuo); the current version is v0.1.0.

💬 Comments