Comprehensive Legal Applications (全维法律应用技能包)

A comprehensive legal practice skill covering the full lifecycle from case intake to enforcement. This skill complements existing legal skills (contract review, criminal defense, labor law, due diligence, etc.) with a focus on litigation practice and legal document drafting.

I. Skill Architecture

Comprehensive Legal Applications
├── Litigation Workflows       → Civil / Criminal / Administrative
├── Trial Practice             → Court Preparation / Defense / Cross-Examination
├── Legal Document Drafting    → Complaints / Answers / Appeals / Opinions
├── Non-Contentious Procedures → Arbitration / Mediation / Admin Review
├── Enforcement                → Execution Applications / Objections
└── Litigation Strategy        → Risk Assessment / Cost-Benefit Analysis

II. Core Workflows

Workflow A: Litigation Procedure Guidance

When the user needs procedural guidance for civil, criminal, or administrative litigation:

Step 1: Identify case type
    ├── Civil dispute → Read references/civil-procedure.md
    ├── Criminal case → Read references/criminal-procedure.md
    └── Admin dispute → Read references/admin-procedure.md

Step 2: Determine current stage
    ├── Pre-filing → Evidence collection + pre-action preservation + jurisdiction
    ├── Filing → Filing materials checklist + jurisdiction rules
    ├── First instance → Evidence deadlines + trial prep + cross-examination plan
    ├── Appeal → Appeal deadline: 15 days(civil)/10 days(criminal) + draft appeal
    ├── Retrial → Apply within 6 months + retrial grounds analysis
    └── Enforcement → Enforcement application + objections

Step 3: Output stage-specific guidance
    - Time limits and deadlines for this stage
    - Required documents
    - Key legal risk warnings
    - Strategic recommendations

Workflow B: Trial Defense & Cross-Examination

When the user needs to prepare for trial, needs defense strategy, or cross-examination plans:

Step 1: Identify trial type and role
    ├── Plaintiff/Prosecution: Claims + evidence presentation + cross-examination
    ├── Defendant/Defense: Defense + evidence + cross-examination
    └── Third party / Appellant / Respondent: Role-specific strategy

Step 2: Generate trial plan based on role
    Plaintiff/Prosecution:
        - Core claims → evidence list → examination outline
        - Anticipate defense counterarguments → prepare rebuttals
        - Predict trial focus points → outline closing arguments

    Defendant/Defense:
        - Core defense position → cross-examination plan
        - Analyze plaintiff's evidence on three dimensions (authenticity/legality/relevance)
        - Prepare counter-evidence / corroborating evidence

    General preparation:
        - Questioning outlines (for opposing party/witnesses/experts)
        - Legal authority index (compiled statutes)
        - Comparable case research report (to persuade judge)

Step 3: Generate trial document package
    └── See Legal Document Drafting and references/trial-practice.md

Workflow C: Legal Document Drafting

When the user needs to draft legal documents, select the template by document type:

General drafting rules:

1. Collect essential case elements (party info, cause of action, facts, relief sought)
2. Follow correct document format (court name, case number, requests, facts & reasons)
3. Verify statute of limitations / appeal deadlines / application deadlines
4. Cite precise legal provisions (full name + article number)
5. Provide review checklist after draft completion

Workflow D: Arbitration Procedure Guidance

When the user needs arbitration procedure guidance or to draft arbitration documents:

Step 1: Identify arbitration type
    ├── Commercial arbitration (contracts / other commercial disputes)
    ├── Labor arbitration (mandatory pre-litigation procedure)
    └── International arbitration (cross-border parties / international rules)

Step 2: Verify arbitration foundation
    ├── Is there a valid arbitration agreement?
    ├── Does the agreement specify a clear arbitration institution?
    └── Is the dispute within the scope of arbitrable matters?
        → If no valid agreement, recommend litigation route

Step 3: Guide arbitration process
    ├── Application → Draft arbitration application materials
    ├── Tribunal formation → Select arbitrators / sole arbitrator
    ├── Hearing → Evidence + examination + written/oral hearing
    ├── Award → Award types / finality of award
    └── Post-award remedies → Set aside / enforcement / non-enforcement
        → See references/arbitration.md

Step 4: Distinguish labor arbitration
    ├── Labor arbitration is a mandatory prerequisite to litigation
    ├── No arbitration agreement needed; apply directly to labor arbitration committee
    ├── 1-year statute of limitations
    ├── No fee
    ├── After award, if dissatisfied → sue in court within 15 days
    └── See references/arbitration.md → Labor Arbitration section

Workflow E: Litigation Strategy Assessment

When the user needs to make a "litigation decision" assessment:

Step 1: Case facts review
    ├── Party information
    ├── Key timeline
    ├── Core legal facts
    └── Existing evidence inventory

Step 2: Legal risk assessment
    ├── Win rate assessment (based on facts + law + comparable cases)
    ├── Cost-benefit analysis (court fees + attorney fees + time cost)
    ├── Enforcement risk assessment (counterparty's solvency)
    └── Procedural risk assessment (statute of limitations / jurisdiction / evidence capacity)

Step 3: Strategic recommendations
    ├── Optimal plan (litigation / mediation / arbitration / negotiation)
    ├── Alternative plan
    └── Risk warnings and mitigation

III. Integration with Existing Legal Skills

This skill complements existing installed legal skills:

IV. Reference Resources

V. Important Notes

1. All legal documents and strategic recommendations output by this skill are for reference only. Review by a licensed attorney is required before formal use.
2. Verify all cited laws and regulations for the latest version — AI may not cover recent amendments.
3. Litigation strategy is highly dependent on individual case details; tailor output to actual case circumstances.
4. For substantive legal analysis of specific cases, consider coordinating with the legal-seven-step-workflow-mctmilk skill.
5. Critical deadlines (appeal period, statute of limitations, evidence submission period) must be manually verified.
6. This skill does not substitute for formal legal advice. For significant cases, retain a qualified attorney.