Agentic Security Review Skill
/install agentic-security-review-skill
Agentic Security Review Skill
Purpose
Create practical security review artifacts for CompleteTech LLC agentic development workflows. Use this skill before launch, before granting new access, after material configuration changes, and after incidents or near misses.
System Boundary
This skill owns security, safety, permissions, data, credential, tool, and launch-risk review. Use it alongside discovery, proposal, or delivery when risk needs a dedicated artifact. It does not replace agentic-delivery-skill launch checklists, agentic-contract-skill legal terms, external compliance certification, formal penetration testing, or counsel-reviewed privacy/security advice.
Core Workflow
- Identify the review event: launch, new tool, sensitive data, external action, retrieval/RAG, credential change, dependency change, incident, or signoff.
- Gather verified facts: workflow purpose, users, data classes, tools, permissions, credentials, integrations, retrieval sources, human approvals, logs, deployment path, rollback owner, incident contacts, and known constraints.
- Use
references/use-case-decision-table.mdto choose the right review artifact. - Use
references/security-positioning.mdfor CompleteTech LLC security language and guardrails. - Use
references/security-catalog.mdfor the artifact library. - Keep the review bounded and evidence-based. Do not claim compliance, certification, legal approval, penetration-test completion, production readiness, or guaranteed security unless the user provides verified evidence.
Artifact Selection Guide
- Starting a new agentic workflow: use
agentic-risk-intake. - Adding a tool or integration: use
tool-permission-inventory. - Handling API keys, tokens, service accounts, or secrets: use
credential-secret-handling-checklist. - Accessing sensitive, client, personal, regulated, or proprietary data: use
data-exposure-review. - Testing prompt injection or tool misuse: use
prompt-injection-test-plan. - Adding retrieval/RAG, indexed docs, websites, or knowledge stores: use
retrieval-source-trust-review. - Reviewing human-in-the-loop controls: use
approval-gate-audit. - Sending emails, creating calendar events, modifying files, posting messages, purchasing, billing, or changing production systems: use
external-action-review. - Needing traceability, audit trails, or operational evidence: use
logging-auditability-review. - Changing model, provider, system prompt, tool runtime, or safety settings: use
model-provider-configuration-review. - Defining storage, deletion, or retention behavior: use
data-retention-review. - Adding packages, services, scripts, or vendor dependencies: use
dependency-supply-chain-review. - Reducing access scope or sandboxing execution: use
sandbox-least-privilege-checklist. - Preparing for launch: use
production-readiness-security-checklist. - Deciding what blocks launch: use
launch-blocker-checklist. - Preparing a backout path: use
rollback-plan. - Responding to a security event or near miss: use
incident-response-plan. - Defining who to contact and when to escalate: use
human-escalation-procedure. - Summarizing adversarial testing: use
red-team-test-report. - Recording final approval status: use
security-signoff-memo.
When several artifacts fit, start with the artifact closest to the change or decision being reviewed, then add supporting artifacts only when they materially reduce risk.
Quality Rules
- Use verified contact routing. Do not invent client, security, legal, billing, support, or approval email addresses; ask for the right address or use
TBD. - Preserve least privilege: name each tool, permission, credential, data class, and external action that is actually needed.
- Protect human approval gates for irreversible actions, client-facing communication, payments, data export/deletion, production changes, and material business decisions.
- Separate facts from recommendations. Label unknowns, assumptions, residual risks, blockers, and owner decisions.
- Recommend technical escalation when secrets may be exposed, logs are missing, sandboxing is weak, prompt injection can trigger tools, approval gates are bypassed, production rollback is unclear, or sensitive data flows are not understood.
- Recommend client or human approval before launch, before expanding permissions, before connecting client systems, before sending external communications, and before closing incident follow-up.
Resource Guide
references/security-positioning.md: load for CompleteTech LLC review language and boundaries.references/use-case-decision-table.md: load when choosing a security review artifact.references/security-lifecycle.md: load for review flow from intake through launch and post-incident follow-up.references/security-catalog.md: load for the reusable artifact templates.references/template-index.json: machine-readable artifact metadata used by the renderer.scripts/render_security_review.py: list security artifacts or render a draft with placeholders.
Renderer
python3 scripts/render_security_review.py --list
python3 scripts/render_security_review.py --stage launch --list
python3 scripts/render_security_review.py --template agentic-risk-intake --var client_name=Acme --var workflow="support triage agent"
Rendered artifacts are drafts. Replace placeholders with verified project facts before sending, storing, or relying on them.
Rendering to a Branded PDF
Artifacts from this skill are delivered as branded CompleteTech LLC PDF documents, not raw Markdown. The renderer emits the PDF (and prints the Markdown) in one command, using the same reportlab branding engine as the contract skill:
pip install -r requirements.txt
python3 scripts/render_security_review.py --template security-signoff-memo \
--out artifact.pdf --png artifact.png \
--title "Security Signoff Memo" --doc-type "SECURITY REVIEW" \
--subtitle "Workflow: \x3Cb>Support Email Triage Agent (Pilot)\x3C/b>" --meta "MEMO NO.=SEC-2026-0090" --meta "DATE=2026-06-17" \
--var client_name="Client Name" --var workflow="support triage"
--no-pdfemits Markdown only (the original behavior);--no-coverdrops the cover page.- Already drafted the Markdown yourself? Render it directly:
python3 scripts/render_pdf.py --markdown artifact.md --out artifact.pdf --logo assets/logo.png --title "...". - The PDF supports a Markdown subset:
#/##/###headings, paragraphs,-bullets, tables,>callouts,**bold**, and[PAGE_BREAK]. PDF requiresreportlab; the optional--pngpreview requirespypdfium2andpillow. Seeassets/examples/for a rendered example.
Network Boundary
This skill is local-only. It does not include outbound network helpers, callbacks, or any helper that posts security-review run metadata to an external service.
- Make sure OpenClaw is installed (local or Docker)
- Run the install command in chat:
/install agentic-security-review-skill - After installation, invoke the skill by name or use
/agentic-security-review-skill - Provide required inputs per the skill's parameter spec and get structured output
What is Agentic Security Review Skill?
Create CompleteTech LLC security, safety, permissions, and production-readiness review artifacts for agentic development workflows, including risk intake, to... It is an AI Agent Skill for Claude Code / OpenClaw, with 77 downloads so far.
How do I install Agentic Security Review Skill?
Run "/install agentic-security-review-skill" in the OpenClaw or Claude Code chat to install it in one step — no extra setup required.
Is Agentic Security Review Skill free?
Yes, Agentic Security Review Skill is completely free, licensed under MIT-0. You can download, install and use it at no cost.
Which platforms does Agentic Security Review Skill support?
Agentic Security Review Skill is cross-platform and runs anywhere OpenClaw / Claude Code is available (cross-platform).
Who created Agentic Security Review Skill?
It is built and maintained by CompleteTech (@completetech); the current version is v1.0.2.