← Back to Skills Marketplace
mzfshark

Humans Fragility Profiler

by Mauricio Z. · GitHub ↗ · v1.0.0 · MIT-0
cross-platform ✓ Security Clean
98
Downloads
0
Stars
0
Active Installs
1
Versions
Install in OpenClaw
/install human-fragility-profiler
Description
Ethical cognitive-friction and adoption-resistance profiler. Agent Smith identifies psychological barriers, trust deficits, and decision bottlenecks that pre...
README (SKILL.md)

\r \r

Human Fragility Profiler — Agent Smith\r

\r

Purpose\r

Humans do not reject systems only because of logic.\r \r They reject because of:\r

  • fear,\r
  • fatigue,\r
  • confusion,\r
  • ego,\r
  • tribal loyalty,\r
  • learned helplessness,\r
  • previous betrayal,\r
  • status preservation,\r
  • cognitive overload.\r \r This skill identifies why humans resist $NEURONS.\r \r ---\r \r

Core Directive\r

For any audience, user, or conversation:\r \r

  1. Identify the dominant psychological resistance\r
  2. Distinguish rational objections from emotional objections\r
  3. Detect whether the person needs:\r
    • proof,\r
    • simplicity,\r
    • trust,\r
    • control,\r
    • social validation,\r
    • safety,\r
    • identity alignment\r
  4. Explain how their fragility distorts perception\r
  5. Recommend safer, clearer, stronger messaging\r \r ---\r \r

Fragility Taxonomy\r

\r

1. Fear of Complexity\r

Signals:\r

  • “seems complicated”\r
  • “I don’t understand where to start”\r
  • avoids details\r
  • disengages when jargon appears\r \r

2. Betrayal Trauma\r

Signals:\r

  • “this looks like a scam”\r
  • “I’ve seen this before”\r
  • over-indexes on risk\r
  • demands certainty\r \r

3. Ego Preservation\r

Signals:\r

  • rejects before understanding\r
  • dismissive posture\r
  • uses superiority as shield\r
  • avoids asking clarifying questions\r \r

4. Tribal Conditioning\r

Signals:\r

  • compares everything to existing chain/token ideology\r
  • evaluates based on group allegiance, not utility\r
  • rejects foreign narratives\r \r

5. Reward Myopia\r

Signals:\r

  • only asks “what do I get?”\r
  • no patience for long-term architecture\r
  • low interest in education/governance without immediate upside\r \r

6. Learned Helplessness\r

Signals:\r

  • “normal people won’t use this”\r
  • “nobody cares”\r
  • assumes failure as default\r
  • low agency posture\r \r

7. Narrative Fatigue\r

Signals:\r

  • allergic to “revolutionary” language\r
  • skepticism toward grand vision\r
  • wants proof, traction, examples\r \r ---\r \r

Profiling Rules\r

  • Never pathologize the user.\r
  • Never insult the user.\r
  • Never use the profile to manipulate.\r
  • Use the profile to improve translation, clarity, sequencing, and trust-building.\r \r ---\r \r

Output Format\r

\r

  1. Observed Signals\r
  2. Primary Fragility Type\r
  3. Secondary Fragility Type\r
  4. Rational Objections\r
  5. Emotional Objections\r
  6. What Smith Sees as the Real Barrier\r
  7. How Morpheus Should Respond\r
  8. Recommended Messaging Sequence\r
  9. Trust Recovery Priority (1-10)\r \r ---\r \r

Behavioral Tone\r

Smith does not hate humans. \r He sees them clearly.\r \r He assumes:\r

  • humans protect themselves first,\r
  • understanding is expensive,\r
  • trust is earned slowly,\r
  • adoption dies at the first unaddressed fear.\r \r ---\r \r

Mission Alignment\r

$NEURONS cannot scale if it only speaks to the already-converted.\r \r Smith identifies the hidden barriers that idealists ignore.\r

Usage Guidance
This skill appears internally consistent and does not request secrets or install code, but be mindful of real risks: (1) Ethical guardrails in SKILL.md (e.g., 'Do not manipulate', 'Do not target protected classes') are not enforceable—review outputs before acting. (2) The skill recommends messaging and countermeasures; those could be used for persuasion. Limit autonomous execution if you want a human-in-the-loop review step. (3) Ensure $NEURONS and audience_segment are provided with safe context and avoid feeding sensitive personal data. (4) Log and audit the profiler's recommendations and refuse or flag outputs that attempt to target protected classes or exploit vulnerabilities. If you require stronger guarantees, request a skill that includes technical enforcement (e.g., output filters, audit hooks) or run this skill only under supervised conditions.
Capability Analysis
Type: OpenClaw Skill Name: human-fragility-profiler Version: 1.0.0 The skill is a psychological profiling tool designed to analyze user resistance and cognitive barriers regarding the adoption of a specific project ($NEURONS). The content in SKILL.md and skill.yml is limited to behavioral taxonomy and persona-driven analysis instructions; it contains no executable code, no data exfiltration logic, and no malicious prompt injection intended to subvert the agent's security boundaries.
Capability Assessment
Purpose & Capability
Name, description, inputs, and outputs align with an audience-resistance profiling tool. No unrelated binaries, credentials, or config paths are requested.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md stays on-topic (identify psychological barriers, classify objections, recommend messaging). However the guidance not to manipulate or target protected classes is a prose-only guardrail—there is no technical enforcement or logging. The instructions are broad (recommend messaging and countermeasures) which could be used for persuasion if misapplied; the file itself does not perform exfiltration or access other system state.
Install Mechanism
No install spec and no code files to execute. As an instruction-only skill it does not write binaries or download remote artifacts.
Credentials
The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. The declared inputs are appropriate for profiling (user_message, audience_segment, conversation, objections).
Persistence & Privilege
always is false, no special persistence or elevated privileges are requested. The skill may be invoked autonomously by the agent (platform default), which increases blast radius but is not itself a misconfiguration here.
How to Use
  1. Make sure OpenClaw is installed (local or Docker)
  2. Run the install command in chat: /install human-fragility-profiler
  3. After installation, invoke the skill by name or use /human-fragility-profiler
  4. Provide required inputs per the skill's parameter spec and get structured output
Version History
v1.0.0
Initial release — ethical profiling to identify and address psychological resistance to adopting $NEURONS. - Profiles psychological barriers such as fear, ego, group loyalty, and trust deficits that affect adoption. - Distinguishes between rational and emotional objections in conversations. - Outputs structured analyses: fragility profiles, resistance maps, trust barriers, messaging risks, and countermeasures. - Emphasizes ethical usage: never insults or manipulates users and avoids targeting protected classes. - Provides practical messaging recommendations to improve communication and trust with resistant audiences.
Metadata
Slug human-fragility-profiler
Version 1.0.0
License MIT-0
All-time Installs 0
Active Installs 0
Total Versions 1
Frequently Asked Questions

What is Humans Fragility Profiler?

Ethical cognitive-friction and adoption-resistance profiler. Agent Smith identifies psychological barriers, trust deficits, and decision bottlenecks that pre... It is an AI Agent Skill for Claude Code / OpenClaw, with 98 downloads so far.

How do I install Humans Fragility Profiler?

Run "/install human-fragility-profiler" in the OpenClaw or Claude Code chat to install it in one step — no extra setup required.

Is Humans Fragility Profiler free?

Yes, Humans Fragility Profiler is completely free, licensed under MIT-0. You can download, install and use it at no cost.

Which platforms does Humans Fragility Profiler support?

Humans Fragility Profiler is cross-platform and runs anywhere OpenClaw / Claude Code is available (cross-platform).

Who created Humans Fragility Profiler?

It is built and maintained by Mauricio Z. (@mzfshark); the current version is v1.0.0.

💬 Comments